wilkes

Who?

Did racist joe have somebody write that for you, clown?

It's a tell. One of the things he does when he knows he's wrong.

As IF he's ever right.

Like you don't ever if anything Connie. Come on man.

IF our leftist schlitZ didn't have any IFs to bigger they wouldn't have anything to say.

You mean like, "If Konrad wasn't a troll, he wouldn't have anything to say?"

Our clown hoaxing another non binding IF.

And that is where the line is drawn. If you can't put your bias and beliefs to the side in order to save someone then you shouldn't be in the medical industry.

So you found other instances of the baker denying service for a different "sin?" I didn't.

Should,
I didn't say the baker picked and chooses which sins to not serve, you did, but you haven't provided any proof.

Mich,
And I've answered this question before, if he's in private practice he should be able to refuse service to anyone for any reason.

I looked, and can't find another instance of the baker denying service for any grounds besides this "sin." Can you?

But picking and choosing "sins" isn't what Christianity is about...is it?

Meanwhile I'm sure this snowflake is ok with someone denying business until it effects him

https://www.wbtv.com/2020/0...nt-policy/

It doesn't matter. You said a doctor should be able to deny service. I gave you a scenario.

Mich,
There's a lot of ifs in that question.

Should,
I have no idea, why don't you show proof of your statement.

So if someone that is gay needs a life saving procedure and there is only 1 doctor in town that can do it, that doctor should be able to say no because they don't believe in someone being gay?

You don't have to take my word. What other "sins" has he denied service to?

Should,
I'll have to take your word on that because I don't see anything but the cake issue.

But the baker said he discriminated becasue of his religion, right? But in action...is that true? Because it seems like he's picking when to discriminate on another criteria.