wilkes

YoYoman (view profile)

The uniqueness of both caucasion and negroid races go far beyond pigmentation and resides at the genetic level. - MtnButtPirate Simply not true. Race is pure pigmentation. Genetic code is unique for every individual. With no racial differences.

Actually, he's right about the genetic differences -

As far as classification of human beings is concerned, race refers to such classification based upon various parameters such as genetic and biological traits, language, culture, traditions, and social practices. The basic parameter for racial classification, however, remains genetic composition which manifests externally as one's anatomical appearance. There are four basic races of humanity - Caucasoid, Mongoloid, Negroid, and Australoid - along with their various subraces (as a result of biological interaction of people belonging to different races) that can be seen on Earth at present.

http://www.buzzle.com/artic...races.html

Go back to chewing your crayons. -Yublomen

For a group founded in 1866 to be spouting anything for 200 years it must be true. You're a mathematical, intellectual genius!!!! ****!

ok I just picked a wilkes county community high on the list:

http://zipatlas.com/us/nc/m...stribution

	Number	Percent	North Carolina Avg.	National Avg.
One race	868	99.20 %	98.72 %	97.55 %
White	866	98.97 %	72.11 %	75.21 %
Black or African American	0	0.00 %	21.59 %	12.26 %

I'd rather my kid bring home a decent person of any color than to bring home white trash or a ****. When I use the N word, it pretty much means black trash. So if you hear me call you white trash, then you know you rank right with an N. Decent white folks are "white folks", decent black folks are "black folks".
-StirringPrick

This is the same hate speech the KKK spouted for 200 years. This is racism.

And ignorant.

Donald sterling

The uniqueness of both caucasion and negroid races go far beyond pigmentation and resides at the genetic level. - MtnButtPirate

Simply not true.

Race is pure pigmentation. Genetic code is unique for every individual. With no racial differences.

SeriousStuff (view profile)	Posted 12:58 pm, 07/22/2014
This is by far the most antiquated topic on Gowilkes. Maybe someone could top it and start a thread on the best methods for churning butter. I cannot believe that people are still caught up in the color, the freaking pigmentation of an individual's skin. Lord help us all!!

You have to remember that Wilkes and the surrounding counties are still very antiquated and intolerant in how people are treated.

http://zipatlas.com/us/nc/c...lation.htm

check out the table and look at the %s

wouldn't* not would

Like I said before I would care either way. As long as he treated my daughter right, I wouldn't have issue with the color.

The uniqueness of both caucasion and negroid races go far beyond pigmentation and resides at the genetic level.

Don't be surprised alone, I'm sure at some point we will see a thread like that. Lol. I really wish people would get over race, sexuality. All people have a right to be here, no matter who likes it or not! Some morons just can't seem to process that reality.

Maybe those threads will come after the thread about why women are allowed to work outside the home and discussion about who gave us the right to vote!

StirringStick78 (view profile)	Posted 12:27 pm, 07/22/2014
I'd like to see them do the same study again, with tools and sciences of today, and see if they get the same result. If they did it would be hard to argue against.

ask and you shall receive:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...ern_humans

In paleoanthropology, the recent African origin of modern humans, or the "Out of Africa" theory, is the most widely accepted model of the geographic origin and early migration of anatomically modern humans. This model has incorporated the 2010 discovery of genetic evidence for some archaic human admixture with modern Homo sapiens.[1] The theory is called the "(Recent) Out-of-Africa" model in the popular press, and academically the "recent single-origin hypothesis" (RSOH), "Replacement Hypothesis", and "Recent African Origin" (RAO) model. The concept was speculative until the 1980s, when it was corroborated by a study of present-day mitochondrial DNA, combined with evidence based on physical anthropology of archaic specimens.

Genetic studies and fossil evidence show that archaic Homo sapiens evolved to anatomically modern humans solely in Africa, between 200,000 and 60,000 years ago,[2] that members of one branch of Homo sapiens left Africa by between 125,000 and 60,000 years ago, and that over time these humans replaced earlier human populations such as Neanderthals and Homo erectus.[3] The date of the earliest successful "out of Africa" migration (earliest migrants with living descendants) has generally been placed at 60,000 years ago as suggested by genetics, although migration out of the continent may have taken place as early as 125,000 years ago according to Arabian archaeology finds of tools in the region.[4] A 2013 paper reported that a previously unknown lineage had been found, which pushed the estimated date for the most recent common ancestor (Y-MRCA) back to 338,000 years ago.[

The recent single origin of modern humans in East Africa is the predominant position held within the scientific community.[6][7][8][9][10] There are differing theories on whether there was a single exodus or several. A multiple dispersal model involves the Southern Dispersal theory,[11] which has gained support in recent years from genetic, linguistic and archaeological evidence. A growing number of researchers also suspect that "long-neglected North Africa" was the original home of the modern humans who first trekked out of the continent

surprised someone has not started a 'what if your kid bought the same gender home' thread......

This is by far the most antiquated topic on Gowilkes. Maybe someone could top it and start a thread on the best methods for churning butter. I cannot believe that people are still caught up in the color, the freaking pigmentation of an individual's skin. Lord help us all!!

I'd like to see them do the same study again, with tools and sciences of today, and see if they get the same result. If they did it would be hard to argue against.

Looks like none of you so called PURE white folks are PURE white

ROFLMMFAO

this is funny as crap

I have what the racists will no doubt think of as bad, sad news:

http://science.howstuffwork...cestor.htm

­In 1987, a group of genet­icists published a surprising study in the journal Nature.­ The­ researchers examined the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) taken from 147 people across all of today's major racial groups. These researchers found that the lineage of all people alive today falls on one of two branches in humanity's family tree. One of these branches consists of nothing but African lineage, the other contains all other groups, including some African lineage.
­Even more impressive, the geneticists concluded that every person on Earth right now can trace his or her lineage back to a single common female ancestor who lived around 200,000 years ago. Because one entire branch of human lineage is of African origin and the other contains African lineage as well, the study's authors concluded Africa is the place where this woman lived.

I don't have a daughter but if my sons brought a black woman home, I wouldn't think anything about it, I don't care if that person was black, Hispanic or blue for that matter, if he loved her and their was mutual respect between them, age is a problem though I agree at 14 yrs. Old your child shouldn't be bringing anyone home!