Thematic, I'm surprised. No apology due to your claim regarding an anti-conservative slant? You're usually more humble than that.
Jason, how, exactly would you characterize the group that often talks about casting spells, occultic fortune telling, and riding brooms around in the sky? Not to mention taking EVERY opportunity to trash Christianity (without any moderator constraints whatsoever), in numerous threads, for years? These are their own words and actions, not mine.
I have no problem with the characterization. Your flags have been due to you following them around from thread to thread, making off topic posts regarding that characterization.
For example, let's say there's a thread about Obama, and one of the "witches" makes a post in the thread about Obama. Then you reply to it with a Youtube link to a video about witches. That has nothing to do with Obama, therefore it's trolling.
Go Wilkes, the next time you see President Obama while discussing how to keep Ellie's patriotism under wraps, tell him I said "Hi."
I called. He said for everyone to keep up the good work, he enjoys reading the back-and-forth
Furthermore, Jason is absolutely lying about the flagged posts. Not the first time, eh? A number of purely cut and paste news articles (on topic) deleted for no earthly reason. that's the REASON for the comments in the first place.
I made no comments regarding posts being flagged, I responded to your false claim that they were removed.
As I explained (several times) before, though, you obviously have numerous filters on your account to prevent your incessant trolling. You really have no right to be surprised when things flag, since it seems to have been your intent all along.
If it's not intentional lying on his part, maybe just a reflection of crappy software that makes some posts irretrievably lost. Sounds kinda like the Hillary email fiasco.
There's no "crappy software", and nothing has been lost. A great many of your posts are flagged by the automated system so that they can be reviewed by a moderator, who then manually determines whether you are trolling.
Maybe 10% of the posts that you have had to flag were found to not be trolling, and were approved.
The 10% that were approved were flagged because the text matched a pattern that you have previously used for trolling.
For example, if 1goddess were to make a thread about witchcraft, and you made a perfectly reasonable reply to it regarding witchcraft, it would most likely flag due to the aforementioned incessant trolling you've done in the past. That's not "crappy software", we simply have to extend the filters more and more each time you try to get around them.
Which you know, because we've had this conversation countless times in the past.
Jason, oh Jason PLEASE use your magical anylitics and show how many threads were created in the last, say, six months by conservative posters as opposed to liberal posters. And use their multiple screen names, too!!
I'm afraid that's impossible, because I don't have any way of automatically determine whether a thread is "conservative" versus "liberal". That's made even more difficult due to some username that are obviously sarcastic.
If you want to ask about certain usernames then I could pull that up, though.
The moderator says the only way to resolve questions, is via PM or reporting.
Do you honestly think that the best way to ask me a question is to make an off-topic post in a thread, and just hope that someone else reports it so that I'll see it?
Assuming so, would you then expect me to answer the question within the thread, taking it further off topic, and just hope that you see it?
Sorry, I'm not doing that. If you want a thread to be seen, then you must report it. And if you want me to ask a question, then you need to send me an email or PM.
