wilkes

Connect the dots, folks.

The moderator says the only way to resolve questions, is via PM or reporting.

Yet at the same time, says "You have to understand that right now, as I'm typing, I have 2,110 unread PMs, and another 1,099 emails in my Inbox."

I guess one way to look at it, is that Jason is the most popular guy in the county. Add another self-congratulatory accolade to his profile, eh?

Or, he's created a bureaucratic mess that is utterly broken.

Jason, oh Jason PLEASE use your magical anylitics and show how many threads were created in the last, say, six months by conservative posters as opposed to liberal posters. And use their multiple screen names, too!!

Furthermore, Jason is absolutely lying about the flagged posts. Not the first time, eh? A number of purely cut and paste news articles (on topic) deleted for no earthly reason. that's the REASON for the comments in the first place. If it's not intentional lying on his part, maybe just a reflection of crappy software that makes some posts irretrievably lost. Sounds kinda like the Hillary email fiasco.

Go Wilkes, the next time you see President Obama while discussing how to keep Ellie's patriotism under wraps, tell him I said "Hi."

I'm a big fan.

Jason, how, exactly would you characterize the group that often talks about casting spells, occultic fortune telling, and riding brooms around in the sky? Not to mention taking EVERY opportunity to trash Christianity (without any moderator constraints whatsoever), in numerous threads, for years? These are their own words and actions, not mine.

Who cares what you and django think major? I know I don't. When you two are done crying to your mommies you can hit the road. Take your sense of entitlement with you.

Between springy and thematic you both keep saying the same bs about how Jason is so unfair and some B's about its a witches coven. Why don't both of you put your heads together start a website and be Jason's competition I mean it's pretty dang simple you both can have whatever rules you want so until then stop belly aching and either play by the rules or go play someplace else.

I've been very busy and away from my desk, but have to agree with Thematic. The last thing I did, or one of the last things before my hiatus, was to directly make note to the forum's owner (Jason) more evidence of consistently bad behavior. We've exchanged several messages on the topic. The most-recent efforts on my part have not earned a response.

He says that Thematic is the only one who has voiced concerns, and I find that impossible to believe.

Antithesis- "If no one else is having a problem, then the problem is you."

The faction that loves to shout down its opposition, works that isolation angle also. Just because Thematic doesn't have a dozen ditto-heads and/or sock-puppets, doesn't mean he's the only one dissatisfied with the quality of discourse.

Thematic- "Meanwhile, napalm boy and his cohorts have been roaming freely for years. Despite reporting of his activities, which proved to be an utter waste of effort. Anyone gonna characterize his contributions as honest discussion? You must be kidding."

If there is such a thing as "trolling", there are two dictionary-definition examples that continue in this forum with impunity. If there are written rules against it, those rules are not being applied to these obvious repeat-offenders. So, yes, there does seem to be a double standard at work here.

And that's too bad.

Let's pretend that all of your accusations and perceived slights are true. Let's assume that Jason is just carving out your posts for his unadulterated amusement. Let's pretend that there is a massive conspiracy that Jason is a part of. Let's pretend that all of your whining and complaining is completely justified and validated. Let's pretend...

This was the innocuous, and on topic post, that Jason just flagged on the anti-police thread. Anyone care to state why? Aside from an underlying bias?

Philadelphia's police union issued a scathing rebuke of Hillary Clinton for including relatives of victims of police shootings at the Democratic National Convention but no relatives of slain police officers.

Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 5 said in a statement that it was "insulted by the exclusion of police widows and family members" as speakers at the convention, from Monday to next Thursday.

"It is sad that to win an election Mrs. Clinton must pander to the interests of people who do not know all the facts, while the men and women they seek to destroy are outside protecting the political institutions of this country," the statement read. "Mrs. Clinton you should be ashamed of yourself if that is possible."

No, no, Ellie. I think you're onto something. You'll really hate yourself if you don't follow through with a thorough investigation into the Go Wilkes/White House link.

Tell us what you find, Patriot!!

Like most of the drones on here like yourself, they are self-appointed water carriers.

Go Wilkes is an arm of the White House?

Oh, my.

Interestingly, one of the links talked about fakebook silencing conservatives...

Why do liberals hate freedom?

I'd like to discuss, but you-know-who just took his virtual machete to three innocuous news links.

I knew it!

for cryin' out loud ...Jason is now a White House operative