Life on mars really??? Or
|
HereToOffend
|
Posted 1:47 pm, 05/15/2019
|
Outlawing abortion is about saving life not government control of health care decisions. Unfortunately, Mikey is as articulate as a bologna sandwich. Liberals on the other hand want the government all up in their life. What can I do when, where, how, how long, why and every avenue in between. But in reality, they don't want government in their life just in everyone else's. Like Bernie doesn't want you to have capitalism but he wants to enjoy the benefits of it.
One shouldn't get an abortion because morally, it is corrupt. It's murder and murdering an innocent life to try to correct an unfortunate event(because we all know you liberals will jump straight to the first most worst case scenario you can dream up) only makes the situation worse.
The real point Mikey is trying to make is we're so quick to jump at the possibility of some type of life form on another planet or protecting other forms of life yet, human life takes a back seat. It's a clump of cells now instead of a baby or whatever the new phrase to eliminate importance from human life is. Out of one side of their mouth it's a clump of cells, out of the other side it's not life. Which is it? Heck, Sarah McLachlan gets all kinds of air time saving puppies but a human baby is a cancerous tumor to libs.
|
|
michaelhjsr
|
Posted 1:12 pm, 05/15/2019
|
RoevWade should not have passed. It fails to protect LIFE..
Dred Scott decision passed by the Supreme Court shouldn't have been made law either.. GOVERNMENT makes law but it can't make it you moral.
|
|
antithesis
|
Posted 12:30 pm, 05/15/2019
|
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973),[1] was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides a fundamental "right to privacy" that protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose whether or not to have an abortion, while also ruling that this right is not absolute and must be balanced against the government's interests in protecting women's health and protecting prenatal life.
Your argument, Mikey, is that the Federal government should have the right to make medical decisions for the woman, and essentially overturn (or at least ignore) the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution.
|
|
michaelhjsr
|
Posted 7:18 am, 05/15/2019
|
The Government already decides and has Authority to control what every they want too. Laws gave the woman the right to commit murder and not be charged. Every part of life now is controlled by the broken constitution of the USA.
|
|
Bestill
|
Posted 4:37 am, 05/15/2019
|
Asking again, as you did not answer anti...Do you want government making medical decisions for you? That is uber totalitarian.
|
|
michaelhjsr
|
Posted 11:03 pm, 05/14/2019
|
Duh the government has already got a decision on it. Government dictates Laws ..
|
|
antithesis
|
Posted 10:58 pm, 05/14/2019
|
I didn't realize you were so liberal, Mikey. You honestly believe that the government should be involved in making medical decisions for people?
That goes beyond liberal, I think. Maybe communist?
|
|
michaelhjsr
|
Posted 8:31 pm, 05/14/2019
|
If a person condones murder they themselves are murders...
|
|
michaelhjsr
|
Posted 7:00 pm, 05/14/2019
|
RoevWade going Down.
Life is better than murdering.
It's about life. Period.
|
|
michaelhjsr
|
Posted 6:41 pm, 05/14/2019
|
Does a heart beat in a fetus represent life?
|
|
|
