Just how did the Russians influence the election
Elmo Cleghorn
|
Posted 4:50 pm, 03/20/2017
|
if you don't care about the meddling in the election, what makes you think it will only be targeting Dems in the future???? are you flippin' serious??????
|
Mad Scientist
|
Posted 4:49 pm, 03/20/2017
|
Ya know, I don't really care if Russia meddled in the election or not.
The important points to remember is Donald J. Trump is President and Cankles isn't.
Despite lying her arse off to the American public, getting questions before the debates, avoiding the issues, having the media attack Trump at every possible angle, despite selling uranium to the Russians, despite selling favors while Sec. of State, despite hiding her brain damage, despite letting four Americans die in Benghazi, despite everyone in Hollyweird, the media and political parties saying she will win ...... Cankles lost and America is better for it.
|
Elmo Cleghorn
|
Posted 4:46 pm, 03/20/2017
|
bobster123 (view profile) | Posted 4:37 pm, 03/20/2017 | The liberal media will take the news that Russia did no no way affect the outcome of the election, will dismiss that and concentrate on something, real or imagined, that will try to undermine the President. |
if you watched the hearings you know that is not true at. Comey was very specific to say there was no evidence of tampering with the "electoral process". he was talking about votes and voting equipment. he was not talking about what had been happening months before that.
|
Jimbojolly
|
Posted 4:40 pm, 03/20/2017
|
sparkling water (view profile) | Posted 3:27 pm, 03/20/2017 | If you're going to complain about Mr. Trump's ethics, you're going to have to produce a candidate was superior ethics. You did not do that. You can try again in 2020.
|
Sparkie, thanks for finally admitting that Trump is unethical.
|
Cajahah
|
Posted 4:39 pm, 03/20/2017
|
Get Trumps nuts outta your mouth long enough to pay attention.
|
Cajahah
|
Posted 4:38 pm, 03/20/2017
|
Did you miss the hearing?
Both the head of the NSA and Comey admitted Russia meddled in the election
Comey said they didn't investigate whether it affected the outcome.
Pay attention you imbecile.
|
bobster123
|
Posted 4:37 pm, 03/20/2017
|
The liberal media will take the news that Russia did no no way affect the outcome of the election, will dismiss that and concentrate on something, real or imagined, that will try to undermine the President.
|
backwater
|
Posted 4:16 pm, 03/20/2017
|
There is a new song out about the Snowflakes! I got Friends in Safe Places ,sounds like the old Garth song I got friends in Low Places!
|
hangsleft
|
Posted 3:48 pm, 03/20/2017
|
He was never going to win the popular vote and did not.
I ask the same of Trump, either the electoral college is good or bad. He can't decide.
This is typical Trump. Apparently we aren't supposed to take his tweets literally.
|
Mad Scientist
|
Posted 3:46 pm, 03/20/2017
|
If you're going to complain about Mr. Trump's ethics, you're going to have to produce a candidate was superior ethics. You did not do that. You can try again in 2020.
Democrats will have better luck finding a magical unicorn, than a Democrat with superior ethics.
|
~glitter and glamour~
|
Posted 3:42 pm, 03/20/2017
|
When the Democrats were entertained with the notion, before the election, that Trump might win the popular vote but not the electoral vote, their immediate response indicated that's the way it works and the Republicans/Trump voters would have to suck it up.
Now, the opposite occurred, suddenly, it's an issue, and it "wasn't a landslide", and he "wasn't the choice of the majority"...blah, blah blah.
No...which is it?
|
~glitter and glamour~
|
Posted 3:36 pm, 03/20/2017
|
They may have been slightly more appealing with Bernie but then there was that "interference".
|
hangsleft
|
Posted 3:36 pm, 03/20/2017
|
He criticized the electoral process as a "total sham":
Which is it?
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 3:31 pm, 03/20/2017
|
Old Sarge is absolutely correct. There was a time when the losing team would spend some time in introspection. They're trying to figure out how they could better appeal to the electorate. But no more. Now they spend the next four years trying to delegitimize the winning candidate. All the while they neglect the possibility of grooming a good candidate.
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 3:27 pm, 03/20/2017
|
If you're going to complain about Mr. Trump's ethics, you're going to have to produce a candidate was superior ethics. You did not do that. You can try again in 2020.
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 3:27 pm, 03/20/2017
|
His opponent was the single most corrupt person to ever seek high office.
|
Ole Sarge
|
Posted 3:27 pm, 03/20/2017
|
Glitter, what else could the democrats possibly talk about if they lost this fairy tale narrative. They have nothing else. Hillary lost and they cannot accept it.
|
hangsleft
|
Posted 3:25 pm, 03/20/2017
|
Not about his pee pee (shutter) that he likes to get peed on.
He is a liar, we have the Tweets to prove it.
|
sparkling water
|
Posted 3:22 pm, 03/20/2017
|
If the Democratic National Committee had been an ethical organization there'd be much less bad information to been released from any hack. It does not bother me at all that information was released. Sunshine is a good thing.
|
|
|