wilkes

Impeachment is a process to remove someone from office. If that person is not in office they do not need to be removed The only reason the Democrats are pushing this is for attention and fundraising. They know this is going nowhere just like the last one. When hatred and bitterness is all you have it makes you look foolish. To attempt to answer your hypothetical question though. IF there were honest people in government, and law abiding citizens in the country WE THE PEOPLE would demand punishment. If the punishment is not as severe as some would like it to be, the law needs to be changed or the Constitution needs to be amended. That is how it works. The law was written to address exactly what you see happening. Power hungry politicians on both sides that are out of control. They work for us, we pay their salaries, it is not the other way around.

Why?

If those Republicans that believe trump could be guilty feel impeachment is Unconstitutional, they should move for him to be indicted by the DA or probably the US Attorney General

Impeachment is the most severe course of action against a President for crimes committed, WHILE IN OFFICE. If they believe he's guilty, after hearing any evidence, they must convict him. But that it's Unconstitutional cannot be the argument

Nonsense

Spark
The President of the Republic and the First Vice President has immunity against any legal proceedings and they cannot be accused or sued in any court of law during their term in office.Dec 30, 2020
Library of Congress (.gov)

The OP proceeds from a false premise.
A former president can be charged for crimes committed while in office.

I commend you Fox for debating, Conrad and Dale61 obviously follow their former Coward in Chief

Ok, so now if he can't be impeached in my question, what course of action would be justified

Trump is the only one to attack the Constitution. As I said, My question is trump, I gave a future situation

Well your problem is that it is just not constitutional. Live with it

The situation I'm presenting is all Congress should be concerned with. Pence should have put trump on his a__ for condoning the chant for him to be hanged and for his wife & daughter being put in danger by his followers

First I would need to assume Trump committed a crime,(which I do not). The Constitution of the United States has worked for many years, just recently Socialist have attacked and tried to undermine it. I there is a needed amendment, there is a process for amending. Changing it on a whelm by political hacks does not work in the best interest of This great freedom loving country.

blinders (view profile)
Posted 7:14 pm, 01/26/2021
Obviously you have no answer aFicioNadoS, so continue to sniff the finger you run up your ___ every night and swallow

This is incorrect. It's a fist, not a finger.

The argument they're making is a former President can't be impeached. So how would you punish them under their reading of the constitution. Not trump, a future President

Fox�I asked for how should a future Predator be punished and gave a specific time frame and crime. So tell me how to punish them, imagine it's a Democrat for your purposes

I don't think it has been proved there was no cheating, and I know for sure Trump telling people to peacefully protest will not meet the threshold for inciting and insurrection.

After Republicans in Congress admitted trump has lied about election fraud and inciting the rioters, why not ask them, so how should he be punished

Trump was never convicted in the first farce impeachment. Impeachments were never intended for a few low intelligent, immature, sound bite, socialist to be able to retaliate against someone who beat them in the ground.

Obviously you have no answer aFicioNadoS, so continue to sniff the finger you run up your ___ every night and swallow