wilkes

Personally, I will vote for Hilary and I fully expect her to be the next President of the United States!

Liberalism eventually rots the brain.

You are likely beyond convincing.

WELL THEN, PIVOTING FAVORITE AND TELL US ABOUT HIM. CONVINCE ME.

Umpire, I take it from your inability to answer my original question that you have not found any admirable qualities in Mrs. Clinton that recommend her to the office she seeks.

You may want to investigate other candidates.

The republicans have several.

PICK A CANDIDATE AND WE WILL TALK. OR DO WISH FOR THE TALKING HEADS PICK YOUR CHOICE.

Questions for umpire and shoulda:

In light of the many scandals involving Mrs. Clinton, do you believe that she is trustworthy?

Do you believe that integrity is important to the effective execution of the office of the President of the United States?

Shoulda, please remind me of what the Conrad challenge is.

Umpire, it looks as if I have a real choice from among several good men and possibly one woman. You don't seem to have a choice as yet.

Please bear in mind that I asked you first. When you come down off your high horse and respond to that request, I'll pick a candidate and let you have a go at him or her.

sparks, are you going to take the Conrad challenge? Do you support his tactics, including his deliberate obfuscation? Is that what our nation has come to? Surely, my conservative friends are better represented than through this rank mouthpiece.

Actually, we ask for proof for Conrad's postings all the time, and he refuses. Take today: He intentionally tried to misinform the masses about the Quinnipiac poll without posting any link. He wanted you to believe his word was gold, which is laughable after the past few weeks of intentional lying. Then, when called out, he miserably hides and continues to whine and refuses to answer the simplest of questions.

So, by Conrad's own standards, proof isn't necessary. Just throw it against the wall, see if it sticks to anyone.

Which is why I say again that Conrad engages in lab rat congress. No proof necessary. Trust me.

WHEN YOU MAN UP AND TELL US WHO YOUR CHOICE IS WE WILL DISCUSS IT.

Umpire, please tell us what qualities you see in Hillary that convince you that she should be president.

ARE YOU GOING TO KEEP DANCING OR ARE YOU GOING TO ANSWER WHAT WAS LEFT FOR YOU.

COME ON NOW. WHY'D YOU REFUSE TO ANSWER?

OH Hangs: You dance about as good as umps, just not as much, so far! It is incumbent upon you to show 'PROOF" where I have done what you accuse me of as your declaration that run and hide are synonyms is false.

Oh conny, I bet you don't like the use of parenthesis because is appears as if you actually said the word. Did I hit a nerve there. I'm not searching every post you made on the subject because I don't have that sort of time, however, I do know you've said individual went and hid. So ran / hid which word bothers you most?

OH HANGS: Please show where I have accused anybody of "Ran" as it is my position to wait patiently while being productive and let the collective LDLP spew forth their usual chew, spit and spin.

I don't want to pile on the guy, but is there anyone left on here who wants to defend Conrad's tactics?

This isn't a question of whether you are conservative or liberal...I'd love to have a conversation with a conservative who brings some serious topics of discussion to the table, without resorting to denigration or falsehoods as a first step. But it looks like even most conservatives have abandoned Conrad and his continuous silliness.

YOU STILL HAVEN'T SHOWN WHERE THE POLL YOU QUOTED IN YOUR OP THAT STATED THAT HILLARY WAS UNFIT TO BE PRESIDENT.

SURELY YOU CAN DO THAT INSTEAD OF RUNNING OFF ON SOME OTHER TOPIC.