wilkes

Uh...are you saying Georgia-Pacific is fictitious?

I do not think you know the meaning of that word.

NEWSFLASH: HILLARY hates the Koch brothers and their financing and political donations! EXCEPT when some of their money goes to her and Bill's joint account. Seems that Bill gave a speech in San Antonio, Texas on May 19, 2010 and was paid $150,000. On financial disclosure forms listing that event HILLARY noted the event planner, not the actual source of the money while Bill noted Georgia Pacific as the source. G-P is owned by ......wait for it ......Koch Industries! Hmmm two different and fictitious sources for the same event and the Clintons don't need auditing!

Or, and novel concept here...some people can do more than one thing at a time.

How embarrassing was it when you realized the Quinippiac poll was just a little more detailed than your masters told you originally?

Thankfully some folks have a gracious plenty to keep them busy all day rather than sit on here hovering like jackals, polishing their zircon encrusted tweezers and making room in their stash boxes for the nits they are compelled pick.

CONRAD (view profile)	Posted 8:53 am, 04/24/2015
.....Way too early to draw this comparison as the primary process has not winnowed the field. We'll see in a year and a half the relevancy of this supposition. Have patience and don't push the process, if you can!....

CON is right on this point.He is just trying to live it up while he can. We all know that Walker will get the nomination, then CON will have to eat crow because of the amount of lies Walker has told.

He won't be back for a few hours, Umpire, if he follows his usual pattern. He'll wait until he thinks the coast is clear.

IN THE QUINNIPIAC POLL THAT YOU HAVE REFERRED TO, WHAT WAS ASKED WAS ITEM #30.

NOW PLEASE ANSWER WHERE IT ASKS IF SHE WAS UNFIT TO BE PRESIDENT?

NOW COME ON, SHOW US WHERE IT ASKS THAT.

YOU JUST GOT CAUGHT IN LIE NUMBER 5 THIS WEEK.

Run away again, Conrad. Once again, you didn't tell the whole story. Once again you cherry picked. Once again you have been proven false. Your masters must be proud.

Hey, at least you haven't reverted to sexism in a couple of days! Progress.

"Would "blank" any there, umps? Way too early to draw this comparison as the primary process has not winnowed the field. We'll see in a year and a half the relevancy of this supposition. Have patience and don't push the process, if you can!

shouldawouldacoulda (view profile)	Posted 8:47 am, 04/24/2015
Here's the poll Conrad unsurprisingly didn't link to...because he's a mouthpiece for right wing hacks.

Here's the poll Conrad unsurprisingly didn't link to...because he's a mouthpiece for right wing hacks.

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/n...aseID=2221

Interesting takeaways from the poll:

1. 62% say Sec. Clinton has strong leadership qualities.
2. More folks feel she cares about their problems when compared to any GOP candidate.
3. More folks approve of the job she did as secretary.
4. 51% feel an investigation into her e-mails would be politically motivated.
5. Her favorability rating is ten points higher than any GOP candidate.
6. Conrad cherry picks information, and lies much more than any candidate he may dislike.

THAT SAME POLL SAYS THAT SHE WOULD ANY OF THE PROSPECTIVE GOP CANDIDATES.

NOW WHAT DOES THAT SAY ABOUT YOU REPUBLICANS?

According to an article yesterday in the New York Post, 54% of Americans now find HILLARY to be not trustworthy and unfit to be president. The item cites results from a recently released Quinnipiac University poll. How longer she can continue the charade of credibility in her candidacy is anybody's guess. Seeing as how the Democrat bench is so weak, the LDLP is pretty much stuck with her, for better or for worse. Her support is waning and it is just a matter of time before she does irrepairable damage to the party.