wilkes

awe shucks blimey...I was getting all excited...

Uh....well...thank you....but I am not gay.

empowers....wow....

P.A.N. Obama made it a federal crime to insult Islam

Blimey, you should have run real hard the other direction away from 'the room mate.' If she had two sons close to your age, she was obviously older than you and only looking for someone to use but than maybe you were looking to use her too. I know you appeared to be innocent as you were much younger than her. Probably you were both oblivious to the real purpose of you being together.. calling it 'love' when it was far from it.

cucumber !! These nuts always think they know more than the president. They give Bush a pass on lying us into Iraq.

The greater threat is from the right wing nutcases cheered on by the likes of Hannity and Limbaugh.

Alonzo, are you still flying your ISIS flag proudly (inside, of course, AND after dark)?

http://www.usatoday.com/sto...n/2075323/

Syrian rebels pledge loyalty to al-Qaeda

All the zombie Obama drones, crawling up out of the sewers, and not a coherent thought among them!

that article was written last night....so its in the past wilbar, and like you said, the past doesn't matter.

THE MILITARY LEADERS NEED TO DO LIKE OBAMA SAYS OR THEY CAN FIND A JOB ELSEWHERE.

YOU SIDING WITH THE MILITARY?

Looks like our military leaders are finally getting a belly full of Obama's profound ineptitude...

http://www.washingtonpost.c...story.html

Rift widens between Obama, U.S. military over strategy to fight Islamic State

Flashes of disagreement over how to fight the Islamic State are mounting between President Obama and U.S. military leaders, the latest sign of strain in what often has been an awkward and uneasy relationship.

Even as the administration has received congressional backing for its strategy, with the Senate voting Thursday to approve a plan to arm and train Syrian rebels, a series of military leaders have criticized the president's approach against the Islamic State militant group.

Retired Marine Gen. James Mattis, who served under Obama until last year, became the latest high-profile skeptic on Thursday, telling the House Intelligence Committee that a blanket prohibition on ground combat was tying the military's hands. "Half-hearted or tentative efforts, or airstrikes alone, can backfire on us and actually strengthen our foes' credibility," he said. "We may not wish to reassure our enemies in advance that they will not see American boots on the ground."

Mattis's comments came two days after Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, took the rare step of publicly suggesting that a policy already set by the commander in chief could be reconsidered.

that was in the past wilbar. you already established that the past doesn't effect the present.

A while back, Obama wanted to arm the snackbars; using some trumped up issue of Assad using chem weapons. The world saw through Obama's lies and said NO WAY.

Now, a media blitz about some subgroup cutting off heads; and Obama trots out the same response - "gotta arm the snackbars!" Well, here's the news...their ALL cutting off heads, and worse. And now the US is helping them? It will be the ultimate irony, and slap in the face to our military, if Obama forces them to train and equip the snackbars who they've been fighting for years!

This is all cover for Obama to launch air strikes against Assad. Does anyone think Putin and Iran is going to sit idly by; or will they provide advanced anti-aircraft.

Race to WW3. Thanks you miserable excuse for a president.

Hmmmm, the way the news media talk, those bombs must be killing the terroists one at a time.

What we have tried in the past is boots on the ground which hasn't worked. I am not talking about past administrations.