Hillary's data company is starting to talk.
skeptic
|
Posted 9:37 pm, 10/11/2015
|
Don't know. But it was classified and stored in an unapproved location. That's illegal.
|
redfly
|
Posted 9:30 pm, 10/11/2015
|
BOFF WAYS !!!
|
Umpire
|
Posted 9:21 pm, 10/11/2015
|
WAS IT CLASSIFIED WHEN IT WAS SENT OR RECEIVED?
|
Skeptic
|
Posted 9:14 pm, 10/11/2015
|
Chirp, chirp. I'll answer for you. Yes it is.
|
skeptic
|
Posted 7:35 pm, 10/11/2015
|
Is it illegal to store classified information on a personal computer?
|
Umpire
|
Posted 4:39 pm, 10/11/2015
|
NO.
JUST SITTING BACK WATCHING YOU TRY AND BEAT A DEAD HORSE.
|
Skeptic
|
Posted 4:24 pm, 10/11/2015
|
I guess ump lost interest.
|
new sn #37
|
Posted 10:18 pm, 10/10/2015
|
Many important and powerful people are just too busy being important and powerful to attend to details of their own lives. Her mistake in this case was trusting a high level Clinton family subsidiary to store these emails. They, in turn, shouldn't have been expected to know that some were work related and some were personal. After all, Mrs. Clinton has given so much of her life to making our lives worthwhile that the lines between her personal and her privates have gotten blurred. Thankfully all these emails are being found and the drives are being reconstructed. Soon, Mrs Clinton can put all this before the American people and we can know just what she has done.
|
CONRAD
|
Posted 10:02 pm, 10/10/2015
|
It's a good thing HILLARY is on top of this situation, otherwise she'd be in for a big supprize.
I really liked this part:
Another false statement by Hillary Clinton and her representatives bites the dust! Presumably they'll all claim they forgot they hired Datto to make offsite backups � which is, to restate a point that cannot be made often enough, the sort of excuse the Democrats' beloved Leviathan State would not accept from the proprietors of a mom & pop grocery store during a tax audit. We're supposed to accept that level of professed negligence and carelessness from the Secretary of State and would-be President, though.
|
CONRAD
|
Posted 8:13 pm, 10/10/2015
|
I know what you mean there, TnT. Maybe we shoulda just rely on the Nkors to just tell everybody their intentions and destinations.
|
shouldawouldacoulda
|
Posted 6:26 pm, 10/10/2015
|
Back on topic, good point.
The original article was worthless.
|
skeptic
|
Posted 6:24 pm, 10/10/2015
|
Ump. I've made my point more than once in this subject. Should I consider you have no argument against it?
|
shouldawouldacoulda
|
Posted 6:11 pm, 10/10/2015
|
Good point.
Dr. Hammer must not be that good a doctor after all. Still as good a candidate as the Gee Oh Pee has, I must admit.
|
CONRAD
|
Posted 6:10 pm, 10/10/2015
|
Wishful thinking there, 37 as the deniers woulda rather shoot the messenger than hear the message. It's their first line of repudiation when they have nothing to say.
|
shouldawouldacoulda
|
Posted 6:09 pm, 10/10/2015
|
Are twit and that and Konrad starting to have a computer thang?
Enquiring minds want to know.
Speaking of the National Enquirer, one of twit and that's approved sources...did anyone see the story about Dr. Hammer messin' up someone's brain? Not his mom, by the way. Saw the headline at the grocery store, didn't have time to get a glance.
I figured you guys would want to know.
|
this n that
|
Posted 5:55 pm, 10/10/2015
|
I must say Conrad, I hadn't noticed. I don't bother usually with idiot.
Besides, I am still shaking my head at this bit of mental wizardry.
kenc (view profile) | Posted 5:01 pm, 10/10/2015 | I think the world is entitled to know when North Korea moves nuclear assets. Why keep it a secret? |
|
new sn #37
|
Posted 5:28 pm, 10/10/2015
|
I just wish there were a list of acceptable news sources so many people wouldn't go astray.
|
Umpire
|
Posted 5:06 pm, 10/10/2015
|
THE WASHINGTON TIMES?
REALLY?
THEY'RE SUCH A SUPERMARKET TABLOID THAT THEY CAN'T SELL THEM, THEY ARE GIVEN OUT FREE.
THE HALF-BAKED MORON JUST GRUBER GOOBERED HIS OWN *** AGAIN.
YOU NEVER GOING TO LEARN?
|
kenc
|
Posted 5:05 pm, 10/10/2015
|
your BS isn't worth a hill of Beans Conard.
|
|
|