wilkes

When did I advocate banning guns?

hillbilly666 (view profile)
Posted 1:20 pm, 06/23/2022
Also, gang violence is gun violence.

Totally ban guns and the gangs will still have guns.

Data and research isn't high on the 50 year old virgin's list of abilities.

He/she may end up producing a research article on metaphorical guns or something similar to when he/she tried to use an article on metaphorical masks to "show proof" that masks don't work.

But hey, everyone's a wannabe expert these days, especially those who are more interested in argument rather than problem solving.

I wouldn't expect too much out of the sorry SOB.

Also, gang violence is gun violence. Innocent people get killed and hurt in both scenarios. Studying gun violence and gun accidents could help highlight the differences and different strategies for dealing with the different types of violence. But the NRA makes sure that doesn't happen.

Ah yes, because only the liberals have EVER misrepresented any data. Lol

If the liberals didn't lie about the data and mislead people to think gang shootings are school shootings, then we would have honest research from the DOJ data

You know it would be cool if the NRA didn't own the legislative branch and made it completely impossible to study gun violence and firearm accidents.

If the petty little insecure trolls didn't stalk and attack JustKnow's every post, we might be able to have some debates and discussions.

This is the most ludicrous thread I've seen posted yet. It poses an insignificant question and merely provides a platform for our friendly neighborhood "experts" to flaunt their "expertise" flawed and erroneous as it is.

Totally!

Wow, killer had a major meltdown this morning. Poor thing is going to have a rough day if she's losing it that early.

Must y'all make every thread unreadable?

Nah.

Quite fummy watching 'ol nuffin'whiner show its arse, again, when confronted with its tsudipity AND behavior.

Now since the sorry SOB has nothing, we can rest assure he/she will toss on that ole semantic police cap and get into the weeds of arguing with himself/herself!

Blast off ABigOleBeech! We all already know that "I am a real loser" hype up this morning was a real doozy!

Best of luck on your adventure to living out your parents dream of you becoming the best loser you can be!

50 year old virgin*

LAUGH. OUT. LOUD. Thanks for proving even more and more what an utter sad existence you live in.

Claiming "wins," claiming to be "better," claiming to be an "expert," and so on...all signs of a sad soul looking to over compensate for something lacking!

Glad the 50 year old version can find happiness in being the world's greatest loser.

You can always tell when killer has been backed into a corner and can't defend her argument. She tries to distract and change the subject by switching to personal attacks.

Good job killer. It always makes me feel even better when you reaffirm that I'm better than you

A'holenados posted:

Thanks Joe, it's pretty much what has already been said, guess you did not read.

If you want to play semantics, I never referred to an AR as "SBR," I simply said "short barrel," which you also said the AR pistol has a "short barrel" as well!

Nothing detracts from the point that an AR Pistol (shorter barrel than rifle, get it?) is still considered a handgun, in terms of purchasing. That is all that was said and the clown show came out hollering, "wrong and liar."

The AR pistol and AR rifles can be bought at any gun store, the "SBR" cannot. It's logical to assume that these were the guns being talked about, not the class 3. Why does it upset yall so much?

Wasn't wrong at any point. Some of you just enjoy arguing with yourselves and jump at any tiny detail and holler about semantics.