wilkes

Poor Joe. So caught up in your hatred, you can't see that you are projecting thoughts and reactions on me that I didn't do. It's OK but #sad.

You seem to be the one full of anger who can't understand what you read or post. But like all liberal leftist Democrat you like to project your thoughts anger and inability's on others. Take a deep breath it will be alright.

You are right they don't.

You have assumed I said much more than what I did.

Why don't you show some of this anger to an industry that allows people, with aggressive and known bad behavior, to continue carrying and purchasing weapons.

You insinuated that with your comment that guns and bars don't mix.

Who the **** said he was?

Stop overreaching and overreacting.

hangsleft (view profile)	Posted 11:12 am, 11/08/2018
Did the shooting happen in a bar? yes or no Joe, you are sure assuming and overreaching. Relax. Shooters name has been released. Had run ins with the law in the past but deemed mentally stable enough to own a gun. Served in the US Marine Corp.

The shooter was not a patron of the bar.

Did the shooting happen in a bar? yes or no

Joe, you are sure assuming and overreaching. Relax.

Shooters name has been released. Had run ins with the law in the past but deemed mentally stable enough to own a gun.

Served in the US Marine Corp.

hangsleft (view profile)	Posted 10:38 am, 11/08/2018
OK Joe. That's why I ask for clarification. Take your fake outrage somewhere else.

Clarification of what anyone with more than two brain cells and the reading comprehension of a 3rd grader can understand oldmans post.

He is stating a fact that CA. has some of the nations toughest firearms laws that's it. No where in his statement did he say in any way shape or form that in your own words we need more guns and alcohol mixed together.

Good grief.

Joseph T.	Posted 10:17 am, 11/08/2018
hangsleft (view profile) Posted 10:07 am, 11/08/2018 So the government needs to employ mind readers. Well that certainly makes lots of sense. I curious where you think they are going to find these mind readers you want the government to hire

The government already has mind readers. The Democrats. They have read the minds, and it is the 'GUN's" fault.

OK Joe.

That's why I ask for clarification. Take your fake outrage somewhere else.

hangsleft (view profile)	Posted 10:30 am, 11/08/2018
oldman1959 (view profile) Posted 9:57 am, 11/08/2018 in a state with some of the nations toughest firearms laws. Oldman, were you saying that more guns should be allowed? Joseph wants to know for sure what you meant by this statement.

I see no such statement in Oldmans post

oldman1959 (view profile)	Posted 9:57 am, 11/08/2018
in a state with some of the nations toughest firearms laws.

Oldman, were you saying that more guns should be allowed?

Joseph wants to know for sure what you meant by this statement.

Once again who said the shooter was a patron of the bar or that guns should be allowed in bars

I'm not the one who said the gov. should hire a person with an ability that doesn't exist that was hangsleft

(1) Joe you brought up mind readers.

(2) I didn't saw the shooter was drunk

(3) Old questioned the gun laws

(4) Guns in a bar don't mix.

YOU WERE THE ONE WHO BROUGHT UP MIND READERS.

hangsleft (view profile)	Posted 10:07 am, 11/08/2018
So the government needs to employ mind readers. Well that certainly makes lots of sense.

I curious where you think they are going to find these mind readers you want the government to hire

WHO SAID HE WAS DRUNK?

Who's angry? But back to the question who said anything about the shooter being drunk or a patron of the bar?

The statement by oldman is true but no where does it suggest your statement at 10:00am