EDITION: Wilkes County â–¼
â–º FAQs â–º PLACE A CLASSIFIED AD â–º ADVERTISE YOUR BUSINESS
37 °
Fair
Registered Users, Log In Here
â–º
Just how did the Russians influence the election

Elmo Cleghorn

Posted 4:50 pm, 03/20/2017

if you don't care about the meddling in the election, what makes you think it will only be targeting Dems in the future???? are you flippin' serious??????

Mad Scientist

Posted 4:49 pm, 03/20/2017

Ya know, I don't really care if Russia meddled in the election or not.

The important points to remember is Donald J. Trump is President and Cankles isn't.

Despite lying her arse off to the American public, getting questions before the debates, avoiding the issues, having the media attack Trump at every possible angle, despite selling uranium to the Russians, despite selling favors while Sec. of State, despite hiding her brain damage, despite letting four Americans die in Benghazi, despite everyone in Hollyweird, the media and political parties saying she will win ...... Cankles lost and America is better for it.

Elmo Cleghorn

Posted 4:46 pm, 03/20/2017

bobster123 (view profile)

Posted 4:37 pm, 03/20/2017

The liberal media will take the news that Russia did no no way affect the outcome of the election, will dismiss that and concentrate on something, real or imagined, that will try to undermine the President.


if you watched the hearings you know that is not true at. Comey was very specific to say there was no evidence of tampering with the "electoral process". he was talking about votes and voting equipment. he was not talking about what had been happening months before that.

Jimbojolly

Posted 4:40 pm, 03/20/2017

sparkling water (view profile)

Posted 3:27 pm, 03/20/2017

If you're going to complain about Mr. Trump's ethics, you're going to have to produce a candidate was superior ethics. You did not do that. You can try again in 2020.

Sparkie, thanks for finally admitting that Trump is unethical.

Cajahah

Posted 4:39 pm, 03/20/2017

Get Trumps nuts outta your mouth long enough to pay attention.

Cajahah

Posted 4:38 pm, 03/20/2017

Did you miss the hearing?

Both the head of the NSA and Comey admitted Russia meddled in the election

Comey said they didn't investigate whether it affected the outcome.

Pay attention you imbecile.

bobster123

Posted 4:37 pm, 03/20/2017

The liberal media will take the news that Russia did no no way affect the outcome of the election, will dismiss that and concentrate on something, real or imagined, that will try to undermine the President.

Cajahah

Posted 4:32 pm, 03/20/2017

Liar in Chief.

backwater

Posted 4:16 pm, 03/20/2017

There is a new song out about the Snowflakes! I got Friends in Safe Places ,sounds like the old Garth song I got friends in Low Places!

hangsleft

Posted 3:48 pm, 03/20/2017

He was never going to win the popular vote and did not.

I ask the same of Trump, either the electoral college is good or bad. He can't decide.

This is typical Trump. Apparently we aren't supposed to take his tweets literally.

Mad Scientist

Posted 3:46 pm, 03/20/2017

If you're going to complain about Mr. Trump's ethics, you're going to have to produce a candidate was superior ethics. You did not do that. You can try again in 2020.

Democrats will have better luck finding a magical unicorn, than a Democrat with superior ethics.

~glitter and glamour~

Posted 3:42 pm, 03/20/2017

When the Democrats were entertained with the notion, before the election, that Trump might win the popular vote but not the electoral vote, their immediate response indicated that's the way it works and the Republicans/Trump voters would have to suck it up.

Now, the opposite occurred, suddenly, it's an issue, and it "wasn't a landslide", and he "wasn't the choice of the majority"...blah, blah blah.

No...which is it?

~glitter and glamour~

Posted 3:36 pm, 03/20/2017

They may have been slightly more appealing with Bernie but then there was that "interference".

hangsleft

Posted 3:36 pm, 03/20/2017

He criticized the electoral process as a "total sham":

Which is it?

sparkling water

Posted 3:31 pm, 03/20/2017

Old Sarge is absolutely correct. There was a time when the losing team would spend some time in introspection. They're trying to figure out how they could better appeal to the electorate. But no more. Now they spend the next four years trying to delegitimize the winning candidate. All the while they neglect the possibility of grooming a good candidate.

sparkling water

Posted 3:27 pm, 03/20/2017

If you're going to complain about Mr. Trump's ethics, you're going to have to produce a candidate was superior ethics. You did not do that. You can try again in 2020.

sparkling water

Posted 3:27 pm, 03/20/2017

His opponent was the single most corrupt person to ever seek high office.

Ole Sarge

Posted 3:27 pm, 03/20/2017

Glitter, what else could the democrats possibly talk about if they lost this fairy tale narrative. They have nothing else. Hillary lost and they cannot accept it.

hangsleft

Posted 3:25 pm, 03/20/2017

Not about his pee pee (shutter) that he likes to get peed on.

He is a liar, we have the Tweets to prove it.

sparkling water

Posted 3:22 pm, 03/20/2017

If the Democratic National Committee had been an ethical organization there'd be much less bad information to been released from any hack. It does not bother me at all that information was released. Sunshine is a good thing.

Advertise your business here for $5/day
This is crazy: in December 2023, the average banner here was seen 1,139,054 times and was clicked 170 times! Click here to advertise for less than $5 /day
Joines & James, Attorneys at Law
Joines & James, Attorneys at Law PLLC. 336 838-2701
Invest commission-free & no account minimums!
We're all about helping you get more from your money. Let's get started today. Trade stocks, bonds, options, ETFs, and mutual funds, all in one easy-to-manage account.