Dontworryimfine
|
Posted 9:48 pm, 08/04/2021
|
"You need to reread it. It said the doctor told her he had recorded it. The article did not say the doctor actually recorded it. I doubt there is a recording. The doctor was bluffing. There is no recording."
There is a recording, he played it for her in proof. This is what prompted her to run for a lawsuit, to save her from it being publicly played.
|
Old School 1951
|
Posted 12:51 pm, 08/04/2021
|
As far as these 2 I would say it is the normal. Their behavior probably didn't stand out. From what I have heard. They need a hotline where you can lodge a complaint when you get mistreated at this hospital here. You cannot talk to anyone if you have a problem. All they do is coverup for each other
|
old lady
|
Posted 9:52 am, 08/04/2021
|
And just check out where other medical personnel have been charged with things like this in the state. What is happening to the medical profession?
|
old lady
|
Posted 9:50 am, 08/04/2021
|
Bestill, what is wrong with you? We are discussing the news. Have you discussed Trump and bad things about him?
|
Bestill
|
Posted 8:43 am, 08/04/2021
|
Oh for the love of God, what is wrong with you people?
|
old lady
|
Posted 8:38 am, 08/04/2021
|
He would have been better off if he had paid for it, right?
|
old lady
|
Posted 8:36 am, 08/04/2021
|
We can agree on that but he is not the only one that looks like trash either.
|
Acumen
|
Posted 11:38 pm, 08/03/2021
|
One thing we should be able to agree on is the doctor is a stupd criminal. He was not smart enough, look where he is now. The idot had all those prescription pads and couldn't find a crack ho in Wilkes. What a loser.
|
Acumen
|
Posted 11:33 pm, 08/03/2021
|
One thing I learned from my involvement with government letters, never keep secrets. You can do pretty much what you want, just don't keep it secret.
|
old lady
|
Posted 11:09 pm, 08/03/2021
|
Just a correction, Winston paper said he had sent a friend request on a "site" to her grandfather not father.
Also it states that he told her he had audio video recordings and he had copies on his phone and other places. More detailed information.
|
old lady
|
Posted 10:58 pm, 08/03/2021
|
And you try to flatter yourself. I do not care a crap about you. I have posted what I have read in various articles about this case. Winston or Charlotte paper had a more detailed article than JP.
|
old lady
|
Posted 10:54 pm, 08/03/2021
|
And that is a post from the paper.
|
old lady
|
Posted 10:53 pm, 08/03/2021
|
The suit says that when they talked on June 14, Thompson played a clip of an audio recording of a private conversation she had with another party. In that conversation, it says, Thompson said he "might release her from his proposed sexual arrangement if he wanted to after one year."
See this Acumen. Don't you feel like a fool saying it did not exist?? Stupid stupid. I can tell you one thing. I have never done anything where anyone could blackmail me!!!!!! I have no secrets from my loved ones. I do not mess around and have no skeletons in my closet. Not like someone else………that was afraid of information that this guy had on her.
She is not a victim……dr is not a victim. They both are guilty of being down right DUMB.
|
old lady
|
Posted 10:46 pm, 08/03/2021
|
Acumen, you are a complete fool. Can't you read? It is in the article that he played it for her. It first says he tried to, and device did not work and then later, he played it for her. https://www.journalpatriot....52f5f.html
|
tmann
|
Posted 10:41 pm, 08/03/2021
|
OMG, I wouldn't touch that ho.
Ha. That's a good one
|
Acumen
|
Posted 10:36 pm, 08/03/2021
|
Old Lady, this just proves what kind of person you are. You want to prove me wrong so badly, you are will to trash someone else to do it. Dirt bag.
|
Acumen
|
Posted 10:34 pm, 08/03/2021
|
You are letting Tman lead you astray. Tman=Thompson-man
|
Acumen
|
Posted 10:33 pm, 08/03/2021
|
You need to reread it. It said the doctor told her he had recorded it. The article did not say the doctor actually recorded it. I doubt there is a recording. The doctor was bluffing. There is no recording. He just though she was fooling around with someone and tried to bluff her into having sex with him. Why else would she have reported it?
|
old lady
|
Posted 10:27 pm, 08/03/2021
|
Acumen, you should read the article again.
The article says, he recorded "private and confidential ACTIVITIES" and said he would turn it over to her husband and other family members. I think one article said he had asked for her father's contact info.
It once again in the article states that recordings "contained highly personal, confidential, POTENTIALLY DAMAGING INFORMATION."
Now exactly what could that be? It is certainly not her grocery list. And what would she not want her husband and father to hear or see? It had to be damaging for him to take the chance to use it against her.
So the lady looks bad no matter what.
|
Acumen
|
Posted 10:01 pm, 08/03/2021
|
Tman, now it makes sense. The T stands for Thompson!
|
|
|