EDITION: Wilkes County
FAQs PLACE A CLASSIFIED AD ADVERTISE YOUR BUSINESS
59 °
Fair
Registered Users, Log In Here
YOU TEA PARTY MURDERERS HAPPY NOW?

White America

Posted 3:45 pm, 08/26/2014

As angry and disjointed as you are, you must have been an unwanted child yourself.

Top Soil

Posted 3:41 pm, 08/26/2014

we bury those people, we don't wad them up in toilet paper and throw them in the trash can. whats your point? if you thought every embryo was precious you would have memorial services ans burials for every tampon you used.

White America

Posted 3:37 pm, 08/26/2014

If kids are fully developed maybe we should put them to work in factories. Heck they should be able to drink too.

Look my abortion analogy is right on the mark but sense some of you trolls seem to be all to pieces about it. Fine, here is another way to look at it. Those kids are nothing more than lost packages shipped with no final zip code, no insurance, with postage due. We simply wrote RETURN TO SENDER. Nothing more, nothing less. It is hard to believe no one would sign for them upon their return .

mommotwo

Posted 3:28 pm, 08/26/2014

Silly, people die naturally everyday. Does that give me the right to kill them?

Top Soil

Posted 3:26 pm, 08/26/2014

mommotwo (view profile)

Posted 3:21 pm, 08/26/2014

And that's where we're always gonna be stuck, top soil. A baby isn't a inconvenience. It's an innocent life dependent on a mother that should have that protective instinct and instant love. Anything else, I don't understand....and don't want to.

that is a gross misrepresentation of the issue. Abortion isn't the killing of new born babies, its the termination of a pregnancy, something that happens naturally in 40% of all pregnancies.

mommotwo

Posted 3:21 pm, 08/26/2014

And that's where we're always gonna be stuck, top soil. A baby isn't a inconvenience. It's an innocent life dependent on a mother that should have that protective instinct and instant love. Anything else, I don't understand....and don't want to.

Top Soil

Posted 3:11 pm, 08/26/2014

another unfeasibly long name (view profile)

Posted 3:09 pm, 08/26/2014

I beg your pardon sir....but you did.


if you read the thread, you would know i wasn't talking about pregnant women, i was talking about fully developed humans.

another unfeasibly long name

Posted 3:09 pm, 08/26/2014

I beg your pardon sir....but you did.

Top Soil (view profile)

Posted 12:13 pm, 08/26/2014

mommotwo (view profile)

Posted 10:13 am, 08/26/2014

can i force you to sustain the life of another human being? yes or no
I think you must have missed the point. No one would have to FORCE me to sustain the life of another human being.

you still havent answered the question.
can a human being be forced to support the life of another human being at the cost of the host?

Top Soil

Posted 3:08 pm, 08/26/2014

mommotwo (view profile)

Posted 3:02 pm, 08/26/2014

can i force you to be surgically attached to Umpire in order to sustain his life?
Once again that's a dumb question. Why can't umpires own momma look after him, lol? Seriously, if I wasthe only one capable of sustaining his life, then why wouldn't I sacrifice nine months for him?

now, can you force someone else into that situation?

Top Soil

Posted 3:05 pm, 08/26/2014

another unfeasibly long name (view profile)

Posted 2:56 pm, 08/26/2014

If it wasn't a murder, then why did they get thar Peterson guy for 2 counts of such? Top soil, I respect you but I've seen you refer to a woman with child as being forced so many times and them being referred to as a host....my heavens. Where would we all be if not for out mother's loving us enough to sacrifice themselves long enough for us to come into this world. I'll just have to agree to disagree with you

i never referred to a pregnant woman as a host, nor have i said that pregnant woman were forced, you are creating a strawman.

shouldn't being a parent also be a choice? there are a lot of parents out there that should not be parents, not saying abortion is the solution, just saying, there should be a choice, and that choice should be the persons who's body is effected.

the murder charges are on a fetus pasted the 32 week mark, and it was the CHOICE of the parents to have the child.

mommotwo

Posted 3:03 pm, 08/26/2014

BTW, how did I end up being responsible for Umpire, lol.

mommotwo

Posted 3:02 pm, 08/26/2014

can i force you to be surgically attached to Umpire in order to sustain his life?

Once again that's a dumb question. Why can't umpires own momma look after him, lol? Seriously, if I was the only one capable of sustaining his life, then why wouldn't I sacrifice nine months for him?

Top Soil

Posted 2:59 pm, 08/26/2014

i didn't say YOUR child. heck seeing that you're failing to grasp the question.


can i force you to be surgically attached to Umpire in order to sustain his life?

another unfeasibly long name

Posted 2:56 pm, 08/26/2014

If it wasn't a murder, then why did they get thar Peterson guy for 2 counts of such? Top soil, I respect you but I've seen you refer to a woman with child as being forced so many times and them being referred to as a host....my heavens. Where would we all be if not for out mother's loving us enough to sacrifice themselves long enough for us to come into this world. I'll just have to agree to disagree with you.

mommotwo

Posted 2:54 pm, 08/26/2014

Can i surgically attach a 5 year old to you, so that the 5 year old can survive. but this surgery will be against your will.

First of all, this doesn't make sense, lol. Second. Yes. If my 5 year old needed to be surgically attached to me to live, then why would I object? That's my child.

I think one big point that you are missing is that there is a way to prevent pregnancy. Rape makes up a very small amount of the abortion cases.

Top Soil

Posted 2:45 pm, 08/26/2014

consistent in the fact that you are affording an unborn fetus more rights than a fully developed human.


can you force a human to sustain the life of another human against its will? i succeed the fact fetuses are humans, but if they are humans with rights, why are they afforded a special right.

Can i surgically attach a 5 year old to you, so that the 5 year old can survive. but this surgery will be against your will.

Hepsibah

Posted 2:39 pm, 08/26/2014

Truthseeker, I think it goes without saying that some on here would like for women to be be required, by force is necessary, to sustain a pregnancy, no matter the circumstances of its origin.

mommotwo

Posted 2:38 pm, 08/26/2014

Umpire, the first step to solving any problem is to find the cause of the problem. Start from there. You can't blame "the tea party" for someone else's actions. Blame the drug cartels. Blame the gangs. Blame the government. Blame the parents that leave them unattended and unprotected. There's plenty of blame to go around.

another unfeasibly long name

Posted 2:32 pm, 08/26/2014

I don't think mommo carried the children from central america ump but if you think she's not a sucker for children, any child....you are badly mistaken. I have never seen her waver from the stance she has on abortion....not one single time.

Enter to win a $10,000 Dream Vacation
Ready to go on the trip of a lifetime? One lucky winner will win a $10,000 dream vacation. Don't miss out; enter by April 14th, 2024!
Advertise your business here for $5/day
This is crazy: in December 2023, the average banner here was seen 1,139,054 times and was clicked 170 times! Click here to advertise for less than $5 /day
Joines & James, Attorneys at Law
Joines & James, Attorneys at Law PLLC. 336 838-2701