wilkes

What about your trickle down economics theory...help out the top earners and they will create new jobs? The stock market is way up so those top earners that can play the markets are getting what they want. Obama went along with the Bush tax cuts. That should have given them another boost.

I thought you folks said it wasn't the government's place to create jobs. That is what private enterprise is supposed to do.

So Obama/the government is ****ed if they do create jobs and ****ed if they don't?

The price of gas is going down because the US has greatly increased the amount of oil we are drilling for and exporting...on Obama's watch. If it's fault when the price went up, then he gets the credit when it goes down.

What about all the people that filed for bankruptcy because of medical bills long before there was an Obama in office? The old healthcare system stopped working for most people a long time ago. The ACA, flawed or not, is at least an attempt to get things back on track.

Moving Until Obama does something about jobs the life we knew before he was elected will never again be attained. He has done everything he could to inhibit the growth of our economy by bending to his environmental lobbyists. The liberals preach about how good the stockmarket is yet the middle and lower class don't have the money to invest in it. Wealthy people benefit from a good market.Fuel is going down but thats only because of fracking and discovery of new sources. You will see some improvement but it's not because of his policys. I am a retired teacher and I stayed in education because I was offered the benefit of good health insurance when I left my post. Now under his socialized medicine program if I get sick in the future I will go bankrupt. Thats the truth. Obama has done nothing I see to help the poor or me. Kay Hagan and Obama will not loose everything they've ever worked for when they get sick. If you think the poor and middleclass will get the same thing they will then you've been drawn in by all their lies just like the rest.

Os, I have to disagree that Obama and Hagan haven't helped the poor. They have done all they could to stabilize the economy which does help the poor and middle class. And they have been hindered from doing more by the Congress that can't agree on anything. So it's not a clear cut case of Obama and Hagan not accomplishing enough, and for sure stabilizing the economy counts for a big plus in their column.

Grandpa- This man Elbert Guillory sees the truth about the Socialist Democratic Liberal. They sit up there in their mansions and make all kinds of statements about how they are going to help the poor and middleclass when they are only using them to get votes. I can't see why people can't see this. They play on hate for the successful and promise the unfortunate that things will get better. I feel sorry for the people that follow them and believe their lies. I believed what they told me for a great deal of my life until I saw that it was all lies. The Liberals stir up hate and this helps their cause. The truth is Hagan or Obama hasn't helped the poor at all. Give them jobs and a chance to be their own masters and their lives will improve. Don't spew hate for the successful. Putting them on social programs will never give them a chance to better themselves.

huntercoin still does not say what Tillis would do specifically and how if elected....after all he did vote 100% of the time with McCrory...hmmm is that not better than 95% for Hagan...and this Hagen was the deciding vote for ACA....to pop your ballon it was the Late Senator from West Virginia Robert Bird.. who was born here in Wikesboro...to the Sales Clan...he was adopted by the Bird family during the Depressionn.. but back to the deciding vote for ACA what a stretch of fact...whew....again how is TIllis a better choice ... he is beholding to just one family KOCH Brothers....they will extract their pound of flesh they paid for....

I've seen all kinds of ads from Thom Tillis about how bad Kay Hagan is. But I don't think I've seen any that say why he's the better choice.

Can someone tell me why he's the better candidate, without slamming Hagan?