wilkes

UNLESS YOU WERE THE ONE TAKING THE POLL AND WAS AN EYEWITNESS, IT IS A LIE.

CORRECT?

BESIDES, WERE YOU NOT THE ONE ON HERE THE OTHER DAY SAYING POLLS DON'T COUNT?

Corny, did you actually read the article and see what people are really concerned with and this for Fox News?

Overwhelming people want to focus on the economy and way way way down at the bottom is immigration, gay marriage, and abortion. Yet those are the 3 subjects your candidates want to talk about.

I removed a few posts for trolling.

THIS JUST IN?

THE DATELINE WAS FROM THREE DAYS AGO.

IGNORANT ***, YOU WANT TO TRY AGAIN?

AND, this just in:

WHAT MESSAGE?

IT WAS AN OPINION. DO YOU NOT COMPREHEND WHAT THE DEFINITION OF OPINION IS?

Does he really think the Washington Post would publish an unknown?

Note from GoNC: a portion of this post was removed for trolling.

THAT IS AN OPINION PIECE FROM SOME UNKNOWN INDIVIDUAL.

NOT MUCH SUBSTANCE.

AND, now this:

Conny, no matter how you twist yours words it means the same. You said if he didn't hear it then it didn't happen, so from this point forward, if you didn't hear it then it didn't happen.

Now when is your next meeting with the FBI or Mrs. Clinton to discuss your obsession.

Huma and any other Hillary crime family member will plead the 5th. They saw how easy Lois Lerner skipped out of town, so with a corrupt Justice Department it will work over and over.

WE WILL REMEMBER THAT WHEN YOU POST SOMETHING ELSE ABOUT HILLARY.

Wrong, again there, CAPPYBOY. I said if YOU did not have direct knowledge of a private conversation that did NOT include you, then your comments were meaningless lies. Defending a defenseless position your problem.

CONRAD (view profile)

Posted 9:31 am, 08/07/2015

Yesterday, on another thread, CAPPYBOY posted comments that could only be construed as having direct knowledge of a private conversation between Bill Clinton and Donald Trump. When called out on this lie he danced away, with a partner or two, and still cannot see the error of his ways. Now CAPPYBOY is in distraction mode, once again, with nothing to add to this thread. Do we see a pattern here? Vulgarity and distraction. An old saw for the resident jackal.

Wrong again, Conny. Umpire pointed to articles and reports concerning the conversation and you ask if he had first hand knowledge of the conversations. This remark was flipped back to you and you didn't like it very much. Your old medicine doesn't taste so good now does it conny.

YOU SAID IF A PERSON DIDN'T HAVE DIRECT KNOWLEDGE, IT *** FALSE. YOU MADE THAT STATEMENT NOW LIVE WITH IT.

Yesterday, on another thread, CAPPYBOY posted comments that could only be construed as having direct knowledge of a private conversation between Bill Clinton and Donald Trump. When called out on this lie he danced away, with a partner or two, and still cannot see the error of his ways. Now CAPPYBOY is in distraction mode, once again, with nothing to add to this thread. Do we see a pattern here? Vulgarity and distraction. An old saw for the resident jackal.

YOU SAID YESTERDAY THAT IF YOU WERE NOT AN EYEWITNESS, IT WAS ALL RUMORS.

WHAT'S CHANGED?

OR WITH THAT COMMENT DID YOU JUST BI***-SLAP YOURSELF?

COME ON IDIOT ***, TELL US.

AND, the hits keep coming:

UNLESS YOU WERE AN EYEWITNESS, YOU ARE JUST PASSING ALONG RUMORS.