Clinton�s inexcusable, willful disregard for the rules
|
shouldawouldacoulda
|
Posted 8:39 am, 05/27/2016
|
There's not going to be any charges, morons.
You'll have something else to get in a lather about after Memorial Day. Just wait for it.
|
|
Umpire
|
Posted 8:19 am, 05/27/2016
|
RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT OR NOT, IF HE BROKE THE RULES, SHOULD THE FBI NOT INVESTIGATE HIM?
|
|
Hillary is a murderer
|
Posted 8:16 am, 05/27/2016
|
If you would read the report Ump you would know the previous secretary "occasionally " used private mail. You also should know that he is not running for President.
|
|
buildawall
|
Posted 8:06 am, 05/27/2016
|
After Hillary gets a felony indictment from the FBI, will Obama grant her a pardon so she can continue to run for pres?  
|
|
Umpire
|
Posted 8:03 am, 05/27/2016
|
IF YOU HAD READ THE REPORT, NOT ONLY HAD W'S FIRST SECRETARY HAD A PRIVATE SERVER, BUT AFTER HE LEFT HIS POST, HE DESTROYED HIS EMAILS.
IT'S AMAZING WHAT ONE CAN LEARN WHEN THEY ONLY TAKE TIME TO READ! YOU CLOWNS SHOULD TRY IT SOMETIME AND LEAVE LIMBAUGH AND THE OTHER KOOKS ALONE.
|
|
asecondthought
|
Posted 8:02 am, 05/27/2016
|
Other peoples actions do not justify hers. She should be brought up on charges, just like a normal citizen would.
|
|
CONRAD
|
Posted 7:59 am, 05/27/2016
|
The inspector General's report details the evolution of these guidelines.
with this part of particular significance:
However, the audit says Clinton did not seek authorization for her email account, and by the time she took over as secretary of State in 2009, the standards for email security were "considerably more detailed and more sophisticated." The department revised guidelines through 2011, according to the report, and "Secretary Clinton's cybersecurity practices accordingly must be evaluated in light of these more comprehensive directives."
|
|
Umpire
|
Posted 7:50 am, 05/27/2016
|
THE SAME RULES THAT W'S FIRST SEC. OF STATE BROKE. RIGHT?
|
|
buildawall
|
Posted 7:44 am, 05/27/2016
|
All eyes on James Comey. Set to release the 2016 version of the stained blue dress. Except this time around, gonna be wrapped up in an indictment ribbon for Hillary. Personally, I don't think Obama will pull Hillary's chestnuts out of the fire this time.
So the question becomes: Will the democrats then rally around the commie, as a last resort?
Or, resurrect some has-been like shotgun Joe, to carry the banner? 
|
|
Umpire
|
Posted 7:39 am, 05/27/2016
|
THE SAME GUIDELINES THAT WERE IN PLACE DURING PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATIONS.
|
|
Umpire
|
Posted 7:36 am, 05/27/2016
|
THE SAME RULES THAT WERE IN EFFECT DURING COLIN POWELL'S TERM AS SEC. OF STATE. BUT HE DESTROYED HIS EMAILS AFTER HE LEFT THE STATE DEPARTMENT.
|
|
CONRAD
|
Posted 7:26 am, 05/27/2016
|
All of these links coulda been found at the end of Limbaugh's comments.
All of which describe hillary's willful intent to subvert the reporting systems put in place to avoid her behavior.
|
|
Runkle
|
Posted 6:59 am, 05/27/2016
|
I don't know what went wrong with this post. I'll try again.
HILLARY CLINTON'S use of a private email server while secretary of state from 2009 to 2013 has been justifiably criticized as an error of judgment. What the new report from the State Department inspector general makes clear is that it also was not a casual oversight. Ms. Clinton had plenty of warnings to use official government communications methods, so as to make sure that her records were properly preserved and to minimize cybersecurity risks. She ignored them. The 83-page report declares that "beginning in late 2005 and continuing through 2011," the department revised its Foreign Affairs Manual and "issued various memoranda specifically discussing the obligation to use Department systems in most circumstances and identifying the risks of not doing so." Ms. Clinton didn't. During her tenure, State Department employees were told that they were expected to use approved, secure methods to transmit information that was sensitive but unclassified, or SBU. If they needed to transmit SBU information outside the department's network, they were told to ask information specialists for help. The report said there is no evidence that Ms. Clinton ever asked, "despite the fact that emails exchanged on her personal account regularly contained information that was marked as SBU." On June 28, 2011, a cable was sent to all diplomatic and consular posts over her signature warning that personal email accounts could be compromised and officials should "avoid conducting official Department business from your personal e-mail accounts." At the time, Ms. Clinton was doing exactly that. https://www.washingt...story.html
|
|
Umpire
|
Posted 6:55 am, 05/27/2016
|
ARE YOU CALLING LIMBAUGH A RELIABLE MESSENGER?
|
|
CONRAD
|
Posted 6:52 am, 05/27/2016
|
Messenger shooting, AGAIN!
|
|
Umpire
|
Posted 6:10 am, 05/27/2016
|
ARE YOU SERIOUSLY TRYING TO USE RUSH LIMBAUGH AS A SOURCE. AND TRYING TO DO IT WITH A STRAIGHT FACE?
|
|
CONRAD
|
Posted 1:39 am, 05/27/2016
|
SO, tell us how your last post has anything to do with this thread there, springy.
Meanwhile,
|
|
springtime123
|
Posted 12:21 am, 05/27/2016
|
hillary is a murderer (view profile) | Posted 8:25 pm, 05/26/2016 | Story on front page on CNN. On politics page for WXII.
Not on MSNBC, no surprise there.
Lots of discussion on Twitter.
This story is far from over. Many believe indictment is coming soon. |
This no where as bad as Trump indictment for raping a 14 year old. If you are right and I am right, we may just have to keep Obama. LOL
|
|
|
