CONRAD
|
Posted 6:37 am, 07/01/2016
|
I have often surmised that you are a stupid liberal shill there, B42 and your post confirms my suspicions.
There is no such group as judicial review. Perhaps you are confused about a fundamental premise of our constitutional republic. Judicial review is the concept behind the balance of powers whereby the judiciary reviews the actions of the legislative and executive branches of our government for their adherence to our Constitution.
Your feeble attempt to distract this thread by attacking an imaginary messenger is typical of your ilk and noteworthy in its foolishness.
Slick got caught obstructing justice and Loretta is compromised. An independent counsel, while already called for, must now be assigned to hillary's investigation(s).
|
Beeblebrox42
|
Posted 1:12 am, 07/01/2016
|
Ironic that you get your news from judicial review...
How many GOPhers have they screamed for this year?
could it be it is a CONSERVATIVE organization and like right leaning?
|
CONRAD
|
Posted 12:56 am, 07/01/2016
|
To the liberals this is just an optics problem, it looks bad. To the remainder of the right thinking world, this signals corruption!
I especially liked this last line:
"Mostly, though, if you want to know why Americans don't trust their government, this meeting is a pristine example of why."
|
CONRAD
|
Posted 8:25 pm, 06/30/2016
|
|
shouldawouldacoulda
|
Posted 7:50 pm, 06/30/2016
|
For whipping the **** out of Republicans every time they run for public office?
|
Runkle
|
Posted 7:39 pm, 06/30/2016
|
Both the Clintons should be in prison.
|
#Worstpresidentever
|
Posted 5:41 pm, 06/30/2016
|
And you thought nobody could be as bad as Holder..
|
this n that
|
Posted 5:11 pm, 06/30/2016
|
Skeptic is right, and it just gets worse. Could be they were talking about this.
http://dailycaller.com/2016...27-months/ state-department-wont-release-clinton-foundation-emails-for-27-months/
And about that indictment, there are E mails between obama and Hillary. So he knew there was a 'private server", and if she's indicted, he would be called as a witness. There goes Lynch's clean reputation.
Besides, as Skeptic says, it doesn't matter anymore.
|
skeptic
|
Posted 4:39 pm, 06/30/2016
|
They are tired of trying to hide their corruption. They decided to be open about it. They know the blind sheep who are going to vote for will anyway no matter what they do. I wonder how much they sit and laugh at people who are voting for her? Kind of like Gruber and his cohorts did. I swear some fools will never learn.
|
Osmosis
|
Posted 4:13 pm, 06/30/2016
|
Dems are saying it sounds fishy but you know they didn't discuss Hilliary's future. You know nothing wrong went on.
|
CONRAD
|
Posted 3:56 pm, 06/30/2016
|
This happenstance meeting of Slick and Loretta reeks of obstruction of justice.
Maybe o'bummer will have her redact the report to make it PC.
|
|
|